Physical Therapists Using Clinical Analysis To Discuss The Art And Science Behind Running and The Stuff We Put On Our Feet

Post Page Advertisement [Top]


Brooks Beast GTS 24 Review
By Bach Pham

The Brooks Beast (Ariel, for women's models) series has long been the brand's shoe with the highest level of stability. In today's market where stability has become more mild-mannered in design across the board, the Beast has become one of one in terms of extreme medial support. Past editions of the Beast have not been the easiest to run in if we're being frank due to their extremely intrusive stability elements, but the latest Beast features the best integration yet which greatly helps elevate the shoe as a daily driver.



Brooks Beast GTS 24
Price: $159.95 at Running Warehouse
Weight: 12.4 oz, 351 g (men's size 9), 11.1 oz, 314 g  (women's size 8)
Stack Height: 36mm h
eel/24mm forefoot
Drop: 12mm
Shoe Purpose: High Level Stability Trainer

Pros: Surprisingly fluid ride for the series, well-rounded and less-intrusive stability than past
Cons: Weighty, a bit snug of a fit, heel could fit cleaner, heel needs bevel


RUNNING SHOE SUMMARY


The Brooks Beast GTS 24 (the women's model is known as Ariel) is a high level stability shoe with a stiff ride from-to-back and firmer ride. The latest edition refreshes the upper with a new engineered mesh. It retains the nitrogen-injected DNA Loft v3 midsole that was introduced in the previous version. Despite on paper being minimal changes, the properties of the midsole feel much improved in the latest update, providing one of the best rides in the series... maybe ever?

SIMILAR SHOES
: Mizuno Wave Horizon 6
PAST MODEL:  Brooks Beast GTS 23





FIT
(To learn how a shoe should fit, check out our full podcast on fit by Matt Klein.)

Bach: The Brooks Beast GTS 24 has fit me fairly well in the standard size. It is a very structured upper that really holds the fit in, meaning it is slightly on the snug-feeling side. There is a slight taper to the shoe which further contributes to the snugness. Wider foot runners will want to definitely scale up to wide or extra-wide (you love to see options). I did enjoy how well the shoe lockdown in the mid-to-forefoot though. The heel is mildly-padded and very smooth, which made me almost feel like I could slip out when laced regularly. I did not have issues after lace-locking the shoe, but I feel like this could be improved in future iterations. The heel counter is as rigid as can be and very sturdy. The shoe breathed just fine in warm weather and should also be comfortable in cooler temps as well. The heel collar is a little sharp around the lacing area. I didn't have any cuts or issues during testing, but occasionally felt it around my ankle. With socks I was just fine. Just something to note!

Typical Size: Men's US Size 10
Shoes that have fit Bach well: Nike Pegasus 40, Saucony Guide 17, Mizuno Wave Inspire 19, Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, Nike Structure 25
Shoes that have fit snug: Hoka Arahi 7, Asics Kayano 30, Puma Electrify Nitro, Brooks Hyperion, Hoka Clifton 9 GTX

Shoes that have fit large: Hoka Gaviota 5, Reebok Floatride Energy X


Doctors of Running Checklist

Is This a Good Shoe for Walking: Yes
Is This a Good Shoe for Standing: Yes
Is the Forefoot Flexible: No
How Flexible is the Shoe: Not at all
Is This a Good Heel Bevel: No
Recommended for Haglunds: No
Recommended for Sockless: No
Durability Expectation: Above Average



PERFORMANCE

Bach: I want to be upfront that I love a firm, moderate stacked shoe, especially as a slow runner (10-11 min miles daily). As one of the team's stability shoe testers, I've tested more softer stability shoes this year (in the realm that stability shoes can get soft) than any year prior and I haven't been thrilled about the number of shoes I feel like I'm really sinking into as I'm running. Though I love a firmer ride, I also wasn't thrilled about testing the Brooks Beast GTS 24 either. Past models were almost unrunnable due to the staggering integration of the GuideRails which made it really hard to do anything outside of truly slow running comfortable. Though Brooks claims nothing has really changed here, the Beast GTS 24 feels totally different and more dialed in. The foam is firm, responsive, and rolls really well from midfoot-to-forefoot. This is not a shoe that is for rearfoot strikers necessarily as the heel is a bit harsh on the landing, but it feels way better going slow, normal, or slightly uptempo than many stability shoes this year for me. I say firm, but there's also enough underfoot that I'm not feeling the road - mostly the dense foam. The cushion feels consistent as well. My longest run was around an hour and a half and it held up excellently and is a contender for what will be my slow half marathon race in 2025.

Despite the hefty weight, it rolls so well that it feels far lighter on foot than its listed weight. I've taken this on long runs, recovery runs, and everyday miles quite happily. I particularly like that the shoe is okay with going different paces. There are several softer models I've tested this year where going a nice, relaxed place feels plodding and like a real fight, but the Beast GTS 24 feels very open to whatever I want to do. The shoe also feels very stable underfoot without being intrusive which helps me really forget about the shoe and enjoy the run.

The shoe does feature a classic Brooks 12mm drop, but it feels more like 10 here due to the nice, rolling ride. If you are a pure heel striking runner,though, it may feel that full 12.

The durability has been excellent. There's a billion layers of rubber on the shoe that likely will take a lot of miles to break. The traction has been fine as well on wet surfaces and a bit off-roading. This also has been a solid walking and a great standing shoe for me thanks to the firmer base.



STABILITY
(Learn more about stability in our full guide)

Bach: In the past, the GuideRails on the Beast, which go full length on the lateral side and most of the rearfoot on the medial side, were way too much guidance for me. I struggled to really do anything in the GTS 23, even for daily walking. This version's integration of the GuideRails is night and day compared to the past. The guidance feels much less prominent, but clearly keeping me in a window moving forward. The wide base is generous as well for landing. The most prominent stability is clearly on the medial side as you can feel a firmer foam underneath (GuideRails still contain a post-element per Brooks). There's actually a fairly light amount of sole flaring on the shoe. The majority of the stability comes from that firmer medial side, widened base and the GuideRails working to keep you centered. I think the integration is very well done here. Those, however, who did do extremely well with past editions may find this to be very mild comparatively, but I do think the improved integration making the shoe feel remarkably more runnable is a positive step forward for the series. Additionally, the shoes didn't bother my flat feet at all which is a plus.


Comparisons: Stability Premium Trainers 
By Bach Pham

Brooks Beast GTS 24 vs. Adrenaline GTS 24


The Adrenaline GTS 24 saw some major changes with a much softer midsole integrated into the shoe. I think the choice here will mostly depend on if you prefer a softer format or a firmer ride. I did personally find the Adrenaline really hard to run slow in and the rearfoot to particularly be a challenge for me. Despite both shoes not having great heels, the Beast felt more forgiving about keeping me forward than the Adrenaline which made me sink back and really notice the heel and it's clunkiness. I'm definitely in favor of the Beast myself. Note, Matt who does run rearfoot with a heavier strike as well, has done much better than myself. in the Adrenaline and definitely prefers it over the Beast. Those who really land rearfoot firmly will likely like the less harsh Adrenaline.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 vs. Saucony Hurricane 24

The Hurricane 24 was a really pleasing release this year. While softer, it has a bit more of energetic feel to it which made it feel far less plodding than other stability shoes. Runners who want a combination of stability and some plushiness will definitely enjoy the Hurricane while those who want more medial stability and a more grounded ride will like the Beast. The fit of both shoes are similarly snug. I really like both shoes and it could absolutely be a "How I feel" kind of day whether I would want the Hurricane or Beast. I think the Hurricane will be more popular for those who want that modern plushness.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 vs. Asics Kayano 31

The Kayano really flips the script in how medial stability works, opting for a softer, bouncy element to pop you back off the ground rather than firmer, traditional stability. The Kayano 31 feels more mild-mannered all-around as far as stability goes and is far softer than past editions prior to the Kayano 30. It almost actually runs like a traditional running shoe which is why it is no surprise that so many runners who tested the shoe, even non-stability users, found the shoe commendable. If you are seeking more mild stability and want some softness along with flexibility in the forefoot, the Kayano is definitely the option to check out. I personally found the Kayano a little bit more work to dig out of as a slower runner. I personally definitely favor the Beast for its ride in relation to my mechanics and more medial stability presence all-around. I do find the Kayano better for picking up speed in due to its much lighter feeling underfoot. The overall fit of the Kayano is slightly more generous and thinner than the Beast all-around. I did have to lace-lock both shoes to keep the heel locked, but I found the Kayano to be more breathable.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 vs. Mizuno Wave Horizon 6

Probably the closest comparison of the four here, the Wave Horizon 6 has a lot of similarities in its manner of guidance and the amount of medial vs. lateral stability to the Beast GTS. I think the overall fit of the Wave Horizon 6 is one of the nicest in the market. Some Mizuno shoes have incredible fit, and this is definitely one of them. I think you can honestly interchange the two of these any time. I find the Beast GTS 24's ride to be nicer for longer efforts though as the Wave Horizon feels a little heavier underfoot, but both accomplish daily miles similarly well and provide a really stable ride. I'm personally in the Beast camp right now out of the two options if asked, but if you find the Horizon which is a much older model now on sale, its definitely worth the price.




RECOMMENDATIONS

Bach: I think the biggest improvements the Brooks Beast can make moving forward is continuing to tighten up the heel security and cleaning up the heel collar in general while also working to improve the heel with an improved lateral bevel so it gets even smoother front-to-back. The weight can always be lighter, but I actually didn't mind it here as the ride as come a long way. With the lack of really high level stability in the market, I also support this model just being available longer as is to provide runners a really good option for medial stability that is becoming rarer and rarer by the day. Brands have a tendency to want to keep changing things, but sometimes we just need to breathe - which to be fair, Brooks is one of the most consistent at.

WHO IS THIS SHOE FOR?

Bach: The Brooks Beast GTS 24 is a high level stability trainer for those who like a firmer ride and tend to run more forward. The integration of the GuideRails is the best in the series so far and the DNA Loft v3 midsole feels much improved in this go-around. The shoe does come in around average price-wise, but is worth the upgrade over the last version in my book due to its improvements all-around. This is not a shoe for everyone, but for those who like the combination of elements it provides, there's really few shoes in the market right now that have all of it. Are GuideRails and medial posts outdated? Maybe, but still necessary to have in a quickly shrinking market.


GRADES

Bach
Fit: A- (A good lockdown with some width options for runners)
Performance: B-/B+
(For those that like a firmer ride and are more forward, a solid performer. Firmer is less popular today though which is why the B- vs. B+)
Stability: A (Very stable medial stability and just enough lateral stability to suit some runners)
Value: B+ (Average price, but huge durability)
Personal: A (One of my favorite stability trainers this year and a surprise as I have typically struggled in the past with this series)
Overall Design: A-


SHOP | SUPPORT DOR

Brooks Beast GTS 24
Price: $159.95 at Running Warehouse

Shop Men | Shop Women

*Using the link to purchase helps support Doctors of Running. Thanks so much!

Check out Gear We Love
Naked Belt The best way to carry your phone and goods on the run. No bounce and various sizes for waist.
Saysky Running Gear: We were really taken aback by this Scandinavian company's ultra-thin, durable performance clothing
Skratch Recovery, Coffee Flavor: Mental and physical boost post run. Coffee flavor is excellent and goes great straight into a fresh brewed cup
goodr Sunglases: Run in style with goodr's super fun sunglasses.
Feetures Socks: Massively grippy socks that will make you feel more one with the shoe
Amphipod Hydraform Handheld Water Bottle: Perfect for long runs when you need hydration in the summer
Trigger Point Foam Roller: Help get those knots out post-run and feel better for tomorrow
Ciele Hat: Our team's favorite running hat of choice!
Fractel Hats: Our team's wider fitting running hat of choice!


FURTHER READING

Altra FWD VIA | Review
A new 4mm drop trainer for Altra













Saucony Hurricane 24 | Review
The premium stability trainer is back for Saucony.














Find all Shoe Reviews at Doctors of Running here.

Thanks for reading!

FOLLOW DOCTORS OF RUNNING ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Facebook: Doctors of Running
Youtube Channel: Doctors of Running
Instagram: @doctorsofrunning
LinkedIn: Doctors of Running
Strava: Doctors of Running
Podcast: Virtual Roundtable
Pinterest: Doctors of Running

PODCAST

Check out the Doctors of Running Podcast to find more reviews, interviews, and running features from the team.

Visit our Podcast Page
Find us on Apple
Find us on Spotify

Editor's Note: As always, the views presented on this website belong to myself or the selected few who contribute to these posts. This website should not and does not serve as a replacement for seeking medical care. If you are currently injured or concerned about an injury, please see your local running physical therapist. If you are in the Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Danbury and Stevens Point areas, we am currently taking clients for running evaluations.

***Disclaimer: These shoes were provided free of charge in exchange for a review.  We thank the people at *** for sending us a pair.  This in no way affected the honesty of this review. We systematically put each type of shoe through certain runs prior to review. For trainers and performance trainers, we take them on daily runs, workouts, recovery runs and a long run prior to review (often accumulating anywhere from 20-50 miles in the process). For racing flats we ensure that we have completed intervals, a tempo or steady state run as well as a warm-up and cool down in each pair prior to review. This systematic process is to ensure that we have experience with each shoe in a large variety of conditions to provide expansive and thorough reviews for the public and for companies. Our views are based on our extensive history in the footwear industry and years testing and developing footwear. If you are a footwear rep looking for footwear reviews or consultations on development, we are currently looking to partner with companies to assist, discuss and promote footwear models. Partnership will not affect the honesty of our reviews.

Please feel free to reach out, comment and ask questions!
Contact us at doctorsofrunning@gmail.com

NEXT:
Altra FWD VIA

Bottom Ad [Post Page]

// ]]>